1998 Shower Room Incident-
Morgan Building- Penn State- Video Tape- Made by a group of men with a man who looked like Jerry Sandusky. A double of Sandusky.
The office in the Morgan Building (Student Athlete Services Center) was broken into after the shower room incident in 1998.
The 1998 incident involved Calhoun and myself, walking into the locker room and shower room, (after hearing screams) and seeing men making a video tape. Calhoun went out of the shower room to get the security guard.
George Steinbrenner was one of the men. The tape was a parody of a molestation of a child. The actors were a man who was small who appeared to be a child and a man who looked like Jerry Sandusky.
They were trying to make it look like Sandusky was molesting a child. There were guttural screams and crying sounds. Steinbrenner laughed as the other man held the video camera.
All of the men in the shower room were in fact men. The small man who looked like a child was just a small man, not a dwarf or midget. That's what I'm saying. The security guard and me and Calhoun saw them.
After the security guard showed up with Calhoun,he said he would take care of it. And then told me and Calhoun to leave. We left.
I asked Calhoun if the guy was a security guard. Calhoun said he was.
It was my bet that the security guard left a report about the incident in the office that was just down the hall from the locker room. And days later, it was broken into by agents under Louis Freeh who was the head of the FBI, to cover the incident that happened in the shower room.
The report was apparently taken out of the office by the FBI agents the night that Calhoun said he suposedly saw Sandusky in the Smeal office building. I believe it was a distraction. The police were called to the Morgan building that night but never showed up.
(The Smeal building was where the teacher's father worked.) We had walked together (the teacher and I) from the Smeal building past the creamery building several times, over to the Morgan building where she worked. The police told us to leave the Morgan building.
THE MORGAN BUILDING INCIDENT:
I'm saying that I thought the sounds from the 1998 video tape Steinbrenner and his associates made in the shower room in the Morgan building was the sounds we heard in Feb. 2001. In the shower room in the Morgan building.
- If you are not familiar with the 2001 incident that happened in the Morgan building, it was only sounds heard by people who were standing in the locker room. There was no one in the shower room. It was just sounds of what seemed to be a child crying and screaming in pain. As it turned out the sounds were from the video that was made in the shower room by Steinbrenner and the man who looked like Jerry Sandusky. The man holding the video camera was apparently Steinbrenner's driver. (In 1998).
- Did Freeh know about the incident in 1998? I think he did.
{ The 2001 incident was actually in the Morgan building.} There was no 2001 incident in the Lasch building. (Actually.) The prosecution only said there was. The incident between McQueary and the man he thought was Sandusky actually did happen in 2002. Not 2001. * There was a reason that the prosecutors believed that the McQueary/Sandusky incident was actually in 2001 and not 2002. (Maybe a video tape,) But they have never said or shown the evidence yet.
I'm saying that the information from the Morgan building incident was used to accuse the officials of covering information about Sandusky. But was a statement written by Coach Paterno in his notebook about the incident the only thing the investigators had as evidence from 2001?
Did the investigators or prosecution (Kelly) have the tape from the 1998 incident? Did they believe or convince others to believe that it was Sandusky in the video? Did they use the information from Paterno's notebook to validate the video as one made of Sandusky?
And how did Kelly know about the paper that was written in the office in the Morgan building about the 2001 incident. How did Kelly know the paper was in Schultz's office?
What happened to the report by the security guard about what Steinbrenner and the Sandusky look alike were doing in the shower room? Was the office broken into to take the report?
I think it was.
I think the investigators or Kelly saw some of the materials that they believed convicted Sandusky and then accused the officials of a cover up. But they never reported what evidence they had.
Where is the evidence?
Is it a video tape that Steinbrenner made of a fake molestation by a man who looked like Sandusky?
Where is the video tape?
The Creamery building is between the Smeal office and the Morgan building. The teacher worked in the Morgan building. Her father worked in the Smeal building. Me and the teacher walked from the Smeal building over to the Morgan building where she worked. That night we saw the men in the office in the Morgan building. It was the same night Calhoun claimed to have seen a man in the Smeal building.
After we got back from the Morgan building, me and the teacher were asked about what Calhoun said he saw. We told security we didn’t see anything. Nor had we seen Calhoun before we left to walk over to the Morgan building.
No one said they saw Calhoun in the building or a man. No one said they saw Calhoun in the building before or after we left or until we got back from the Morgan building.
Petrosky said he didn’t see anyone in the building. The other janitor who was working with Petrosky also said she did not see anyone in the building.
After the case started in 2011, Petrosky changed his mind and said he did see Sandusky in the building that night. The Smeal building.
Calhoun did not say he knew who the man was that he saw. After the trial started Calhoun said he knew then that it was Sandusky that he had seen in the Smeal building that night.
I didn’t know where they were working that night from reading the papers. I knew because I was there.
The night we both heard the commotion in the shower room in the Morgan building, I was waiting for my teacher friend to come down from her classroom.
I went into the shower room to see what the problem was, first, and Calhoun and the security guard came in about a minute after me.
I had just asked the little man who looked like a kid if he was alright. He told me to get the BLEEP! Out and to leave them alone. The guy holding the video camera just said, “yea just go on.” They went on making rude comments.
I just said I was seeing if (whatever the guy was, was OK, that’s all.)
And about that time the security guard, with Calhoun walked into the room.
That’s what happened. And then the security guard told us it was OK and just to leave the shower room and we did.
I didn’t know if the security guard filed a report on the incident. If he did I figured the report was in the office. And that’s the reason the men were searching the office.
I don’t know if they kept the video. I believe there was something that convinced people that Sandusky did molest a child, more than McQueary’s statement about 2002. I guessed that the video tape would be convincing if the people who saw it were told it was Sandusky.
The ultimate question in the Penn State case isn't whether or not they framed Sandusky. The ultimate question is whether or not Louis Freeh framed Sandusky and people in the system and at Penn State helped him? Like members of the board of trustees or someone working in the state department of education.
It is assumable that Jerry Sandusky was framed. Now it's a question of who, why, and how.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
1998 Shower Room Incident- Morgan Building- Penn State- Video Tape- Sandusky Look Alike
I think the office in the Morgan Academic Support Center was broken into after the shower room incident in 1998.
The 1998 incident involved Calhoun and myself, along with a security guard walking into the locker room and shower room and seeing men making a video tape.
George Steinbrenner was one of the men. The tape was a parody of a molestation of a child. The actors were a man who was small who appeared to be a child and a man who looked like Jerry Sandusky.
They were trying to make it look like Sandusky was molesting a child. There were guttural screams and crying sounds.
All of the men in the shower room were in fact men. The small man who looked like a child was just a small man, not a dwarf or midget. That's what I'm saying. The security guard and me and Calhoun saw them. The security guard said he would take care of t. And then me and Calhoun left.
I asked Calhoun if the guy was a security guard. Calhoun said he was.
It was my bet that the security guard left a report about the incident in the office that was just down the hall from the locker room. And later, it was broken into to cover the incident.
The report was probably taken the night that Calhoun said he saw the man in the Smeal office building. (The Smeal building was where the teacher's father worked.) We had walked together (the teacher and I) from the Smeal building past the creamery building several times, over to the Morgan building where she worked.
I'm saying that I thought the sounds from the 1998 video tape Steinbrenner and his associates made in the shower room in the Morgan building was the sounds we heard in 2001. In the shower room in the Morgan building.
* If you are not familiar with the 2001 incident that happened in the Morgan building, it was only sounds heard by people who were standing in the locker room. There was no one in the shower room. It was just sounds of what seemed to be a child crying and screaming in pain. As it turned out the sounds were from the video that was made in the shower room by Steinbrenner and the man who looked like Jerry Sandusky. The man holding the video camera was apparently Steinbrenner's driver.
{ The 2001 incident was actually in the Morgan building.} There was no 2001 incident in the Lasch building. (Actually.) The prosecution only said there was. The incident between McQueary and the man he thought was Sandusky actually did happen in 2002. Not 2001. * There was a reason that the prosecutors believed that the McQueary/Sandusky incident was actually in 2001 and not 2002. (Maybe a video tape,) But they have never said or shown the evidence yet.
I'm saying that the information from the Morgan building incident was used to accuse the officials of covering information about Sandusky. But was a statement written by Coach Paterno in his notebook about the incident the only thing the investigators had as evidence from 2001?
Did the investigators or prosecution (Kelly) have the tape from the 1998 incident? Did they believe or convince others to believe that it was Sandusky in the video? Did they use the information from Paterno's notebook to validate the video as one made of Sandusky?
And how did Kelly know about the paper that was written in the office in the Morgan building about the 2001 incident. How did Kelly know the paper was in Schultz's office?
What happened to the report by the security guard about what Steinbrenner and the Sandusky look alike were doing in the shower room? Was the office broken into to take the report?
I think it was.
I think the investigators or Kelly saw some of the materials that they believed convicted Sandusky and then accused the officials of a cover up. But they never reported what evidence they had.
Where is the evidence?
Is it a video tape that Steinbrenner made of a fake molestation by a man who looked like Sandusky?
Where is the video tape?
The Creamery building is between the Smeal office and the Morgan building. The teacher worked in the Morgan building. Her father worked in the Smeal building. Me and the teacher walked from the Smeal building over to the Morgan building where she worked. That night we saw the men in the office in the Morgan building. It was the same night Calhoun claimed to have seen a man in the Smeal building.
After we got back from the Morgan building, me and the teacher were asked about what Calhoun said he saw. We told security we didn’t see anything. Nor had we seen Calhoun before we left to walk over to the Morgan building.
No one said they saw Calhoun in the building or a man. No one said they saw Calhoun in the building before or after we left or until we got back from the Morgan building.
Petrosky said he didn’t see anyone in the building. The other janitor who was working with Petrosky also said she did not see anyone in the building.
After the case started in 2011, Petrosky changed his mind and said he did see Sandusky in the building that night. The Smeal building.
Calhoun did not say he knew who the man was that he saw. After the trial started Calhoun said he knew then that it was Sandusky that he had seen in the Smeal building that night.
I didn’t know where they were working that night from reading the papers. I knew because I was there.
The night we both heard the commotion in the shower room in the Morgan building, I was waiting for my teacher friend to come down from her classroom.
I went into the shower room to see what the problem was, first, and Calhoun and the security guard came in about a minute after me.
I had just asked the little man who looked like a kid if he was alright. He told me to get the BLEEP! Out and to leave them alone. The guy holding the video camera just said, “yea just go on.” They went on making rude comments.
I just said I was seeing if (whatever the guy was, was OK, that’s all.)
And about that time the security guard, with Calhoun walked into the room.
That’s what happened. And then the security guard told us it was OK and just to leave the shower room and we did.
I didn’t know if the security guard filed a report on the incident. If he did I figured the report was in the office. And that’s the reason the men were searching the office.
I don’t know if they kept the video. I believe there was something that convinced people that Sandusky did molest a child, more than McQueary’s statement about 2002. I guessed that the video tape would be convincing if the people who saw it were told it was Sandusky.
