Stumble
Jerry Sandusky was /is innocent of the crimes he was accused of. He was framed. An imposter was used to frame him along with false testimony and tainted evidence.
*Calhoun did not see Sandusky in the Smeal building in 1998 like he told the Grand Jury.
*Calhoun did not see Sandusky molesting a child in a shower room in 1998 while working in the Student Athlete Services Building. He saw an imposter.
*Certain people tried to accuse Sandusky for what the impostor did.
In 1998, reports were erased that described the actions of the imposter making a video in a shower room. The office where the security guard put the report was broken into by men who worked under Louis Freeh. The same men were later sent to the Alamo Bowl in 1999 to look for information that would warrant an FBI investigation into the Penn State athletics program. Specifically recruitment violations and player favors. In the process it seems that a child was told to make up a story about Sandusky while there at the Alamo Bowl.
There was no federal FBI probe.
The reports that were given to Ray Gricar, the District Attorney (DA) - were actually reports that had been made on the impostor trying to convince people he was Sandusky.
No reports on the activities of the impostor on campus have ever been seen or talked about by the investigators.
One of the most important parts of the activities of the impostor was the taping of a video in a shower room where it was made to look like Sandusky molesting a child. That tape has never been talked about. The report on the making of the video has never been reported. The fact that the reports are missing is also suspicious. It isn't difficult to assume that the men working in the FBI under Freeh who were illegally rummaging through an office in the building where the incident took place, were there to destroy the reports on the incident.
The most telling factor with respect to the possibility of association between Freeh and the FBI agents and the men making the video with the impostor, would be a contact between Freeh and George Steinbrenner. In 1998.
The fact that no one has ever questioned the association between Freeh and Steinbrenner, during the time when Gricar was asked to investigate false claims against Sasndusky, leads to a conclusion that if there was an association at the time, then there was an attempt to help frame Sandusky by Freeh, in association with Steinbrenner.
If Freeh did take part in framing Sandusky and Penn State it would be pretty certain that the agents were told to break into the office and take the reports on the incident that showed they were tring to get people to believe that Sandusky was using the showers to molest children.
It is also quite possible that the assistant coach did not actually see Sandusky when he said he saw him in 2002 and then in 2001. That he could have seen the impostor. The same impostor that Calhoun saw in the shower room in 1998.
The impostor being involved in making tapes that could be shown to people to trick them into believing it was Sandusky in the videos that were made, is true. He was making the tapes. The reports were covered.
If Calhoun told the Grand Jury what he saw in the shower room in 1998 he must have told them about the video tapes.
Did he or didn't he? Did the Grand jury and investigators know about the tapes or not?
the other incident reports that were covered by the investigators happened in the Student Athlete Services Building in 2001 at 9:30 in the morning. Screams were heard coming from the shower room. The room was empty. But the incident was reported anyway. There were police reports. Security reports. And notes taken on the incident. Administration was informed and talked to police who searched the area. There were reports on the police searching the campus and the building and shower room. Nothing was found but the searches and reports were written. But there were never any reports mentioned on the incident.
Was information on this incident said to have been on the Lasch building incident? Were pictures or video tapes shown to validate an incident that was made up?
Would the assistant coach swear it was Sandusky if he knew the impostor was a double of Sandusky and looks almost exactly like him?
Testimony was altered several times. Stories were changed. Memories were coached. Could a child tell the difference between a twin of Sandusky and the real Sandusky. could their memory play tricks on them? Could the impostor fool a child into thinking that he was Jerry Sandusky?
I believe he could. I believe he did. And I believe the investigators and prosecutors knew it. And Jerry Sandusky went to jail for something he never did.
