« January 2017 | Main | March 2017 »
Posted at 01:52 PM in arts, Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0)
The best way to fix medical care in America is to find a way to decrease the amount of money spent on basic healthcare visits. The technical issue of providing specialized care when needed by patients should be a decision made by the personal care physicians. MD's or Specialists.
Having people in government offices make those decisions isn't really that good of an idea.
Standard quality of care, for all, should be the requirement by law. Rights protections need to be put back in place after losing rights to quality care under the ACA.
MD's ability to make determinations on primary care can be enhanced through allowance of in house testing in minor treatment facilities. This can be a working environment for the doctors who can give references to specialists, but who can also determine the treatment of the patients according to their needs.
Facilities that specialize in diagnosis and treatment of basic care needs for any patient can reduce the overall costs. When cost is a primary factor, this change in facility set up would be helpful. More non profit ( basic care) facilities that serve the needs of communities would help to financially stabilize the private sector medical industry, economically speaking.
Posted at 10:20 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
If Ted Kennedy actually did murder Bobby Kennedy, the question is why did he kill Bobby? I believe the answer is in the history of the associations of his father and his ties to organized crime, human trafficking, drug trafficking, but especially pornography. The pornography was in turn linked to sexual slavery in the Muslim community, with respect to elements directly associated with the Democrat party in Washington D.C.
Bobby Kennedy as the Attorney General, interfered in Ted's business, in those areas. (Ted) had associates in radical factions, some of the radicals were Muslim. ( Like Sirhan Sirhan ) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirhan_Sirhan
Ted Kennedy had information that could be given to assassins that were responsible for plotting the death of Bobby Kennedy.
Ultimately the Democrats and Ted Kennedy's objectives in political outcomes in America was to team up with Muslims and colonize the middle class. Democrat/Muslims colonize middle class Americans and institute a regime of socialist propaganda.
Globalization became a primary concern of major Democrat party leadership.
* The exploitation and radicalization of Muslim communities by Democrat influence stemming from the intelligence communities in the U.S. Government, along with agency support from allied governments, helped to destabilize the poorer Muslim nations. Thus, the Democrats created a promotional area for their infiltration with elements working with them from the outlying Muslim community. Like powerful leaders and businessmen in Washington and New York. And in the international Global Network. *
Global militarization became a hugely profitable business that in turn fed the elements within the Democrat party elite. While it helped to erode the financial base of the Middle Class in the U.S.
Therefor the answer to helping the Muslim communities worldwide would be to dissolve the relationship of the power between the Democrat party in the federal government and the oil rich nations of the Middle East.
And restoring normalized relationships with non radical elements with American political leaders, outside of the Democrat party regime. This would help to stabilize factors that are positive for wellness within the political and social structures of the Arab nations. With emphasis on more honest relations and less aggravation and hostilities.
Race baiting and fear mongering only served the interests of Democrat political idealism based on colonizing principals. And while it may be a very strange idea to Democrats, that Americans actually have a country and still have some rights protections, their dream of total domination and colonization of America while they played God didn't work out as well as they wanted it to.
Ted Kennedy is the key to understanding the real story behind the assassination of Bobby Kennedy. I think Sirhan Sirhan was just set up by Ted and his associates. Probably something that happened a lot between radical elements and Democrat super criminals.
We need to help the Muslim communities recover from 50 years of Democrat party politics and Global Economic reasoning.
Things will get better in the Middle East. Truth will prevail.
Posted at 12:09 PM in arts, Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0)
Colonizers
Eminent Domain over American land owners, and communities rights, granted to Global Economic industrial giants with special interests peddling from Washington, (especially with respect to investment portfolios like the presidents) should not be allowed.
Eminent Domain given to corporate interests, that can or do, endanger natural resources is an act of invasion politics, or nothing short of Colonization or Global Economic Colonialism.
Violating the rights and endangering the future of Americans, as well as supporting the take over and exploitation of smaller nations by more powerful aggressor nations is what?
Publically calling for the agreement and political support generated from the President's office in Washington, of more take overs by Super Powers in Asia? What is that?
Placing interests of foreign corporations over and above the interests of Native American sacred sites and tribal lands with no regard to public safety. What is that?
Propagating the need for foreign oil, while calling foreign oil interests- American oil- and at the same time never mentioning the oil finds in west Texas. As if he wishes the oil in Texas and Alaska would just go away. More money for who, if America stays dependent on oil companies the presidents associates have huge financial ties and political ties in? For America or him.
Using racial slurs against a person who has a legitimate claim of Native American ancestry, while at the same time degrading a race of people with belittling slangs.
Negating the horrific conditions and sending victims of Syria away at our front door when they have no where else to turn to for help. Without offering any assistance to the starving or dying or the families who have lost everything, including loved ones at the hands of tyrants committing genocide and mass murder. Is this America?
Calling the innocent victims of unspeakable war crimes and acts against humanity the potential terrorists.
..........Sickening. Shameful. It is.
Posted at 11:00 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0)
The question is: Can a president be impeached for discrimination? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_States As in- discrimination of religious people, women, or individuals who have been racially profiled in statement, in mockery, by a president. (A bigoted statement to degrade, so to speak.) Repeated acts of bigotry, as an example.
I believe the answer is found under High Crimes and Misdemeanors. (See below
In the case of the present official serving as the President of the United States, I would suggest that the matter would be determined on the grounds of abuse of authority with conduct unbecoming, a close second.
The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct peculiar to officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, (Of a president) bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, conduct unbecoming, (Of a president.) and refusal to obey a lawful order. Offenses by officials also include ordinary crimes, …..
Sources: Wikipedia
*Supporting leaders of governments that are guilty of human rights violations. That also, may qualify. To support the strong while cutting off the defenseless that are under dictates of violence and living with atrocities committed against them. I don't believe these are American principals or values.
Posted at 09:16 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Why would anybody want to endanger the water reservoir on the Missouri River at Cannon Ball North Dakota. By the Standing Rock Reservation? It's just stupid.
Look at the pictures and see how easy it would be just to divert the pipeline away from the main body of water. To the north would give time to check spills. Why not just move the thing?
If it is not moved the alternative may be to dam the river up to the north of Cannon Ball area.
Posted at 12:14 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Dam the river north of the DAPL pipeline and divert the water around it. Or south of the pipeline to catch run off if it happens to become tainted with oil spillage.
Pass a bill or sue the government for the funds to divert the stream.
Pumps could also be installed to pump water from a levy to a location past the pipeline area.
Posted at 11:20 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0)
All oil is not the same. North Dakota oil is not the same as Canadian oil sands (tar sands) oil from Alberta. Oil from both areas are fracked but the Canadian oil has added ingredients contained in the crude oil that goes into pipes.
Impact studies may or may not have included the assessments of possible oil spills from pipelines that contain more harmful toxins. Toxins that are more dangerous to humans and the environment. Canadian oil is very dangerous to water supplies. Oil spillage from Alberta oil sands oil would be far more damaging than regular crude, from North Dakota for example.
Is every impact study by the EPA just a formality? Have effects on water supplies by pipeline spillage from Alberta oil really been studied? Have tests been conducted?
Why does selling the pipeline to another company give rights of eminent domain to foreign companies?
Companies involved in this DAPL project have lost billions of dollars. The corruption and flimflammer state government officials and the incompetence of the justice system is showing to the whole world.
Why is this one project so important to the corrupt politicians and businessmen backing it?
Cultural abuse would be a good term to describe the Water Protectors and DAPL Protesters in North Dakota at the Standing Rock area near the Missouri River. But cultural rape would be a better term to describe the events leading up to the decision to OK the completion of the pipeline.
It's not just investors, like Warren Buffet, in DAPL and companies like Phillips petroleum that are the foundation of influence over the political process, there are agencies involved that worked hand in hand with Buffet and major oil companies. Agencies like the CIA and U.S. State Department with personnel who shared information with investors.
Information that led to actions. Actions that have never been explained. The CIA acting in the interests of Warren Buffet. Warren Buffet acting in the interests of the CIA.
What would happen to Buffet's investments in Phillips and DAPL in association with Alberta oil in Canada if a sudden increase in oil production from west Texas occurred from a deposit in the Permian Basin region? The west Texas deposit that has been called the largest find in 50 years, an estimated 20 billion barrels.
I believe that foul play was involved in protecting those interests. A possibility of a huge land swindle. Or outright theft of hundreds of thousands of acres land in west Texas in the Permian Basin region.
However you look at it the DAPL is dirty. And all oil is not the same. If DAPL is dirty oil and we have 20 billion barrels of honest Texas oil, then, we don't really need to abuse people over the DAPL do we?
Investigating Warren Buffet's role in the circumstances surrounding DAPL and investments would be something that could benefit the most voters.
And I believe that someone is covering up 200,000 acres of land that was purchased in west Texas in 1986-87.
That's a lot of market share in a nation left to depend on foreign oil. Think about that.
Posted at 06:45 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Macro Global Economic strategy implemented by the Trump administration favoring international oil giants and foreign leaders with questionable track records? Isn't that the same as the failures of global economics and elitist government leaders who ran their nations into the ground with Global Economics and New World Order politics?
What is it now? New E-world order politics and local derivatives of the shambles of global economic reasoning? What is going on here? It's like Trump put on a Trump mask but in reality he has turned into a mini version of Elizabeth Warren. Big loser Global Economics, (Warren) verses Little Loser Global Economics, (Trump).
In Big Global Economics, Warren, talks about the economic giants, while they put more and more regulations on the small businesses and banks operating in America. Meanwhile, the politicians and financial giants take advantage of everything and everybody they can.
Of course Warren and company knew nothing until the market collapse in 2008. Eight years ago. Eight years of listening to their obsession with Global Economics. But what other promise did we have left? According to Warren's "Hope" we must have more Global Economic rational, in order to survive as a people and a civilization. And America was the mistake that needed to be corrected by more Global World government control. With a strong emphasis on Global Finances being the most important aspect of human existence. (Or Democrat Economic Philosophy.)
One thing we do know about politics and big money is that crooks don't need less regulations, they need fewer laws and a system that looks past their activities, usually while emphasis is placed on the elements orchestrated for purposes of distraction.
Distract and grab politics.
Posted at 11:43 AM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0)
"Assimilation Is Genocide" Items Live Link to shop
Items to view on blog. Use side post pictures or link above to shop. See articles on side post. T Shirts come in choice of your favorite colors. Tops. Men's and Ladies items formatted, or by request. Send email or message.
Posted at 08:42 PM in arts | Permalink | Comments (0)