DRR Blog Favorites

Running toxic oil through pipelines in the U.S.A. should be outlawed. (NOW!)

  It's not the pipeline that is dangerous. It's what they want to put in the pipeline that is dangerous. It's how they get what is put in the pipeline that is destructive and hazardous to people's health and dangerous to the environment and to animals.

   The toxins that are generated from the processing (fracking) the oil sands in Canada are rapidly spreading. The toxins are entering the water in Alberta, unchecked. The retaining lakes are leaking, unchecked. The toxins are killing wildlife. The toxins will reach American waters if they are not stopped. The toxins leaking into the water supply in Alberta and into Aquifers can pollute rivers and streams in the United States. Eventually the toxins could work their way into the Mississippi River.

   Over 200 leaks have been reported from the new pipelines alone. It's not a question of whether the pipeline will leak toxins into water supplies in the United States, it's a matter that it will, without doubt. The pipeline is not safe. The toxins in the oil sands sludge to keep it moving through the pipelines is not safe. The toxins in the oil in the pipelines are unsafe.

    The oil that goes into the pipelines needs to be classified as hazardous chemicals. The pipelines are not safe enough to protect the water. The oil from Canadian oil sands in Alberta should be outlawed. America does not need the toxic oil from Canada. The destruction in Alberta should be stopped.

    Putting toxic oil into pipelines and transporting it through the United States should be outlawed.

  

  

Excerpt From "Big Oil and LBJ" Oil Sands Destruction. "Toxic" Alberta -Artwork

Senators called for an investigation into the lobbying of the oil industry by Thomas Hennings, the chairman of the subcommittee on Privileges and Elections. LBJ was unwilling to allow a senator not under his control to look into the matter. Instead he set up a select committee chaired by Walter F. George of Georgia, a member of the Southern Caucus. Johnson had again exposed himself as being in the pay of the oil industry. 

    The first three pages of this text is very interesting. It shows the relationship with the Democratic elite politicians and the most powerful oil lobby in Washington. This period leading up to the Johnson presidency and then during his time in the White House resulted in the power lobbying from the industry in Washington. It is a study in the evolution of power and politics of big oil. "The Seven Sisters"  *Excerpt from "Big Oil and LBJ" :

     The "Seven Sisters" was a term coined in the 1950s by Italian businessman Enrico Mattei to describe the seven oil companies which formed the "Consortium for Iran" and dominated the global petroleum industry from the mid-1940s to the 1970s. The group comprised Standard Oil of New Jersey and Standard Oil Company of New York (now ExxonMobil); Standard Oil of California, Gulf Oil and Texaco (now Chevron); Royal Dutch Shell; and Anglo-Persian Oil Company (now BP). In 1973 the members of the Seven Sisters controlled 85% of the world's petroleum reserves but in recent decades the dominance of them and their successor companies has been challenged by the increasing influence of the OPEC cartel and of state-owned oil companies in emerging-market economies. http://www.texasalmanac.com/topics/business/oil-and-texas-cultural-history 

 That is fact. That is true. LBJ and oil just kind of went together.

 

    This is a pic of the oil sands toxic ponds and waste lands in Alberta Canada. The scale of miles isn't quite this large but you get the idea. This is where the oil comes from in the Keystone Pipeline and will probably come from in the new Dakota Access Pipe Line.

http://www.redbubble.com/people/justdoingit/works/24020819-toxic-area-of-destruction-alberta-oil-sands

 

  

Stop Foreign Governments Right of Way and Eminent Domain Through Our Lands - (American Oil American Jobs)

Oil Pipelines equal:    Foreign Governments Right of Way and Eminent Domain Through Our Lands.

   American companies build the pipelines, foreign governments buy it. Keystone pipeline carries Canadian oil. Dakota Pipeline has already been sold before it was finished. It will probably carry Canadian oil too. The toxic kind from Alberta. The kind that is dangerous to drinking water and wildlife. The kind that contaminates fields and streams with cancer causing chemicals.

   All through America. Their oil pipelines. Serving the needs of foreign oil companies given right of way through America by the global economic controlled government.

   Our best policy is to stop poison oil from the Keystone pipeline coming out of Canada and stop the Dakota Access Pipeline now before the oil sands industry gears up more flow through the pipelines. That will result in more spills. More pollution. More toxic chemicals.

    Use West Texas oil and Alaska finds to supply the nation with cleaner oil. Less pollution. Less toxic waste. Less chemicals. Less of a chance to pollute water in our heartlands.

   Get the oil in West Texas and refine it. No need to endanger a thousand miles of land and water for the Canadian government and global oil interests. I think that there are already lines to the refineries from West Texas to Midland or Odessa.

   Extra chemicals to transport it aren't necessary.

   American oil. American jobs. Sounds good to me.

 

 

What I Was Writitng About

Shutting down the oil sands operations in Alberta Canada – permanently- would be the best Christmas present ever!

   Ending the continual flow of filthy, toxic, oil sludge in the pipelines that crosses over into America would be a long waited for day of environmental justice.

   Oil sands oil is mixed with very toxic chemicals. The chemicals help it to move through the pipelines. The toxic chemicals are very hazardous to people, causing cancers, and to animals that have been killed drinking the water that the oil sands region pollutes.

   Inclusion of the oil with toxins, into the water, can result in sickness for many people.

   And that is one reason people are against the oil pipelines carrying the hazardous products to refineries. But that’s not what I’m writing this about.

   I forced myself to listen to “Barnaby Bright” last night, the whole record. It truly is a work of genius.

   I saw this movie on Amazon Prime called “A Complete Nobody”, I think that’s what it was. No, it was aa “Complete Unknown”

     Rachel Weisz, played a professional imposter, or an identity switcher that just fell into the habit of playing different roles. She was a doctor, a scientist, entertainer, and so on. It’s really an interesting movie. But I think it might be a ghost story, of sorts.

     I was reading about Sonoco, Sunoco? Buying out Energy Transfer – Dakota Access Pipe Line. So, I was wandering if they are going to stop the pipeline. If we’re setting on more than a TRILLION dollars worth of better, cleaner, easier to process, American oil, why would the company want to buy a pipeline that transports Canadian oil that is toxic to people and the environment? It doesn’t make any sense!

   The government couldn’t keep everyone from producing oil to protect their investments in Global Finance Canada. Global Oil Finance schemes would be a better name for global economics.

   Our government wants to give global economic networks another trillion dollars of our money and let them pollute our natural resources. The New World Order of Global Economic Networks is bankrupt. We can’t afford it any more.

   Bringing me to the point of what I was writing about, my old man. Dad. And Thanksgiving memories. It would be so much easier if he was in charge for just one day. And when the government wanted to steal more of our money for their loser economic plans in the New World Order too Big To Fail Economic Government Partnership network strategies and financeering, the old man could just say, “we can’t afford it.”

   Happy Thanksgiving!

When You Stand Up To The Globalization Backed By Our Government- (Like Standing Rock)

  When you stand up to an international corporation that is backed financially, by a number of investors that are involved in promoting the interests of globalization over yours, in your own country, and your government helps the global gang to exploit you and your nations resources, then you know what the government is really all about.

   The global economy is just a fancy government term for colonization. Global colonizers would be a better description of what is happening in our country. A good example would be in the Dakotas  concerning the Dakota Access Pipe line company and the Water Protectors, they call themselves.

   The response from Obama would be expected from a president who promotes global economics over American sovereignty. Global finance over American rights. Global employment opportunities over American workers. And son on and so on.

   Raping of natural resources and exploitation of cultures by international, government backed, military backed, corporate entities is not new in America.

    In Globalization, we can see clearly that greed outweighs common sense or consideration for the rights of the unimportant people under the tyrannical abusive exploitive government. Standing Rock in Dakota would be a good example of how the politics of power overshadows the rights of the citizens. And how the government responds with violent forces if any attempt to seek justice is made when major injustices are committed against innocent people on their lands.

   The government allowing a pipeline to be placed under the Missouri river, that will probably leak into the water and that water if contaminated could poison thousands of people, shows you what the government politicians actually do to protect people from environmental hazards.

   The real reason the pipeline is being put under the river, water reservoir, is because it's cheaper to do it that way and leaks are more difficult to prove or detect.

    That's like denying and covering up the toxic leaks before they ever happen, or a plan to cover up the leaks. You should know that such pollution isn't really allowed in a lot of other European countries.

    Our government would allow that level of toxins into the drinking water but yet put tariffs on a nation for one barrel of pollution in another country.

    The civil war started over tariffs.

 

   

  

"It's OK I'm Older WG" Rap lyrics by Don Robbins (Subtitled - I Can't Help It)

It's OK I'm Older WG, I'm older WG-

I'm older, I'm older, I'm older WG!

Older WG, older WG....

Older-older-older-older-older WG!

Come and party with me.....

And the older WG!

That's just the way it be!

In the U.S. of WG! WG! W-W-W-W-W-W-G!

G-G-G-G-W-W-G-

WWG WWWG-

Older WG....

It's all about me!

Older WG.....

Do you be older WG?

Like the real me-

Getting hard to see-

Another WG......

Older WG-

Me WG-

Me WG-

Me WG- WG -WG- WG- WG-

All I know, all I see....

Another Me, (older) WG.

 

 

Obama Supports Global Oil Conglomerates- The Real DAPL= Alberta Toxic Oil Sands - Not Needed

Obama Supports Globalization - Global Oil Conglomerates- The Real DAPL

   The reason Obama wont uphold the laws and peoples rights involved in the protests against DAPL is because of his support for globalization.

  Globalization interests have rights over Americans because the rights of Americans get in the way of global financial dominance of American people by corporations. Obama is stuck in the middle. He doesn't want to look like he is on the side of globalized oil interests against the American people. Interests that jeopardize the lands and water of America by putting toxic oil into our environment through the pipelines that come from Dakota and Canada. The Alberta Canada oil sands are the most toxic on earth. The chemicals that are put into the pipes to keep the oil sand sludge flowing are toxic to humans and the environment.

  Trump is supposed to be for American interests over the global oil giants. The Dakota Access Pipeline, DAPL, is under the control of those interests. It's obvious that the pipeline is being built to carry more toxic oil into America from Canada. After the pipeline is built it can be linked up to pipelines that carry oil sands oil out of Canada. Alberta is close to Dakota. It would be easy to sell the pipeline to the Canadian oil giants and use it to pump more dirty oil into America. Trump hasn't made any comments about the toxic oil sands oil compared to American crude that is plentiful and much cleaner than Canadian oil.

   Prohibiting the polluting Canadian oil from the pipeline would increase the market for good West Texas crude. There is a trillion dollars worth of it. As it is the oil from Texas could completely replace the Canadian oil in the market in America,

   The oil from West Texas doesn't need to be shipped across the U.S. to refineries, endangering farm lands, towns, wildlife, and water. There is very little danger from the oil in Texas polluting the environment or endangering the health of Americans or Canadians.

   The choice between America oil and Canadian oil is clear. We don't need oil from Canada. Replacing the dirty oil from Canada with better Texas oil also creates jobs for Americans.

  In that case the Dakota Access Pipe Line project is unnecessary. Canadian oil is also unnecessary.

   If clean Canadian oil is available that's fine but the pollution from the oil sands oil in Alberta should be outlawed. The chemicals that are added to the sludge in the pipelines should be stopped. There is no actual necessity for the oil sands oil in America or the pipelines that are being built to carry more of it.

   The blessing of God in America to end dependence on the deadly, toxic, polluting, oil sands oil from Alberta Canada, is West Texas Intermediate crude.

   Praise God. Thank you  Jesus!

Larger than Canada's dirty oil sands deposit. We don't need dirty oil from Alberta!

 

 

 

  

  

  

   

Let's Pass A Regulation In Washington D.C. That....

   Let's pass a regulation in Washington D.C. that lets people who didn't vote have a one time chance to go and vote for Clinton or Trump and then recount the electoral votes.

   We can't redo the whole election but we might be able to give people a chance to vote on both sides who missed the vote. And then see what the outcome would be. I think everyone knows what would happen. About 50 million people would go out and vote.

Man Reports Oil Spill Cover Ups- Pipelines

   There are new videos on the controversy over the oil pipelines coming out of the north in America and Canada. Alberta, and Dakota,  primarily.

    In one new video, just out, the 17th of November 2016, a man tells a story of chemicals being put into the oil so it will flow easier through the pipeline. The chemicals are toxic to the environment and dangerous to humans and animals.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIJgMFeYHsc

   Apparently there has been a system of cover ups with respect to oil spills. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVPKKNLb1N8 It sounds more and more like the Dakota Access Pipe Line is actually being constructed to sell to the oil sands industry or eventually to China.

   The idea that the chemical additives in oil from the Alberta fields will be secretly pumped through the Dakota Access Pipe Line, seems to becoming more and more of a reality.

   The right of ways and domain on foreign pipelines should not be honored by the government. The trick of American companies getting right of way through lands privately owned and then selling the pipelines to foreign companies needs to be checked.

   We don't need that chemical enhanced toxic oil in our country to begin with. Don't need it and don't want it.

   

   

 

 

80 Degrees Today In Oklahoma- Picture Of Grasshopper -(strange weather)

  November 17th 2016. To day in Oklahoma, (crazy weather capitol of the world) it was 80 degrees f.

   I don't remember a day this warm in the middle of November  before, in my lifetime, in Oklahoma. I also saw a grasshopper. Took a picture of it. 

    I checked the weather reports over the last few weeks. Warm days, colder nights. There should be a freeze this week. About 31 degrees. The days this week are in the 60's and 70's.

    My belief is that the oceans are the reason that weather patterns have been affected. Not carbon emissions.